The makers, of course, were of the opinion that the film - even with Von Hindenburg played an actor - was a correct representation of the historical reality. On September 27th, 1932, Tannenberg finally opened in Berlin.123 The film was first released in the provinces. In the meantime, an uncut version of the film had premiered in Vienna on August 31st - the sensitivity regarding the way in which Von Hindenburg was pictured was clearly a German matter.122 On September 8th, the Berlin FilmprГјfstelle finally decided to pass the film after some scenes had been cut. The former were primarily afraid to see a myth being disturbed, whereas the latter was of the opinion that the army commands were pictured in such a commonplace way, that it could understand why the censors did not want to see Von Hindenburg associated with this.121 Not only did a number of right-wing newspapers applaud the censorship decision, the left-wing liberal Vossische Zeitung also wrote that it could comprehend the decision. Nevertheless, far from everyone agreed with the protest of LichtbildbГјhne. It is not clear why the committee thought that both matters indeed applied. The next day LichtbildbГјhne rightly remarked that the Lichtspiel Gesetz did not allow in any way for a prohibition on the grounds of the fact that Von Hindenburg was played by an actor.120 According to the magazine, it would have been better, had the members of the censorship committee considered whether the version was historically correct and whether it could damage the current president. Protests from the production company led to the opening date being postponed. Die letzten Tage vor den Welbrand, multi-interpretable motives were used to prohibit particular scenes. Der Film wurde zugelassen es wurden aber sГ¤mtliche Szenen verboten, in denen der Sieger von Tannenberg, Hindenburg, auftritt.Дie Kammer hat ihre Entscheidung damit begrГјndet, dass die Darstellung des amtierenden ReichsprГ¤sidenten im Film die Г¶ffentliche Ordnung und das deutsche Ansehen gefГ¤hrde sowie lebenswichtige Interessen des Staates verletze! Die Firma hat dagegen sofort Beschwerde eingelegt.'9 Nach mehr als vierstГјndiger Dauer ist, wie wir bei Redaktionsschluss erfahren, heute bei der FilmprГјfstelle Berlin Гјber den 'Tannenberg'-Film eine Entscheidung gefallen, die einigermassen sensationell wirken muss. Below is the complete report, which was printed in bold letters on the front page:Дie groteskeste Entscheidung in der Geschichte der Zensur Apparently, Von Hindenburg was not happy with his 'mirror image' and ordered the censorship committee that the film could not be shown until a maximum number of Hindenburg scenes had been removed (in the end, not all scenes were removed).118 For LichtbildbГјhne, this was the most ludicrous reason for rejection in the history of censorship. However, to the great disappointment of the makers and other Tannenberg worshippers, this was not to be.116 Like every film to be released in Germany, Tannenberg had to be shown to the censors first, something that took place on August 29th.117 The members of the censorship committee had a problem with the role of the actor playing president Von Hindenburg, who closely resembled him. Partly, it was shot at the Ufa Studios in Babelsberg, while the open air shooting took place in East Prussia and in the Masur Lakes area, the areas where the actual battle had been fought.115 Originally, the film was due for release on 26 August 1932, the day on which the eighteenth anniversary of the Battle of Tannenberg was to take place. The film had been shot in the summer of that same year. An interesting event preceded the opening of Tannenberg, which took place late September 1932.

Schlacht bei tannenberg